In this role, you'll apply your expertise to help train next-generation AI systems. Your work will shape how models learn, reason, and perform through high-quality, real-world input. No prior experience in AI is required — your domain knowledge is what matters.

This is an evaluative engagement: you will assess and analyze written legal content, not provide legal advice or representation. There is no attorney-client relationship, and your professional judgment about written argument is the core value. The focus is on those skills lawyers employ daily — discerning whether writing is precise, properly qualified, pitched to the appropriate audience, and free from unwarranted overstatement. Recognizing confidently stated but unsupported writing is central to the project.

• Evaluate and compare multiple AI-generated written responses to legal and technical prompts for clarity, tone, and compliance with instructions.
• Assign analytical quality scores and compose detailed rationales for each assessment.
• Identify responses that sound authoritative but lack precision, contain overstatements, or present unsupported claims.
• Detect inconsistencies, ambiguities, or factual inaccuracies in digital content.
• Document findings and insights meticulously in online review platforms.
• Collaborate asynchronously with project managers and reviewers to ensure consistent evaluation standards.
• Work independently while managing deliverables and deadlines per project requirements.

• Qualifying law degree from a university in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, or New Zealand.

Work arrangement: Fully remote